Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant:
1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Kalfountzos v. Duncan et al
as 2:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
Nikiforos P. Kalfountzos
Defendant:
Arne Duncan and Timothy Geithner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Geithner
as 3:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Troy Anderson
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Geithner et al
as 4:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Conway
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner and James R. Browning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conway v. Geithner et al
as 3:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Conway
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner and James R. Browning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael P Romano v. Douglas H Shulman et al
as 2:2011cv08303
Respondent:
Richard E Byrd, Jr, Timothy Geithner and Douglas H Shulman
Petitioner:
Michael P Romano
Cahill v. Bank of America, NA
as 2:2011cv01688
Plaintiff:
Diane Cahill
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Recontrust Company, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
