Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Peggy Roberson v. LVNV Funding LLC, et al
as 14-6298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEGGY ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING LLC, TOBIE GRIFFIN and NATHAN & NATHAN, P.C.
Angela Fitch v. LVNV Funding LLC, et al
as 14-6271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA FITCH
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING LLC, TOBIE GRIFFIN and HOSTO & BUCHAN
Alfred Hickman v. LVNV Funding LLC, et al
as 14-6273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED C HICKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING LLC, TOBIE GRIFFIN and NATHAN & NATHAN, P.C.
William Melvin v. PYOD, LLC, et al
as 14-5674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. MELVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PYOD, LLC and TOBIE GRIFFIN
Robert Bradford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 14-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC, TOBIE GRIFFIN and BUFFALOE & ASSOCIATES
Tillman v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Tillman
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC, Morgan & Pottinger, PSC and Tobie Griffin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Janie Smith
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC , Tobie Griffin and Morgan & Pottinger, PSC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
White v. Sherman Financial Group, LLC et al (TV3)
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
James C White
Defendant:
Sherman Financial Group, LLC , LVNV Funding LLC , Resurgent Capital Services L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gutherless v. Sherman Financial Group, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gutherless
Defendant:
Sherman Financial Group, LLC , LVNV Funding LLC , Resurgent Capital Services L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberson v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Peggy Roberson
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC , Tobie Griffin and Nathan & Nathan, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
