Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lin v. Chen's Buffet City II Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01585
Defendant:
Chen's Buffet City II Inc., Tom Doe and Qi Se Chen
Plaintiff:
Yun Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Chen's Buffet City II Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01585
Defendant:
Chen's Buffet City II Inc., Tom Doe (Last Name Unknown) and Qi Se Chen
Plaintiff:
Yun Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cortes v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Cortes
Defendant:
Sergeant John Diffley, John Doe, Tom Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allstate Insurance Company v. Garriss et al
as 3:2012cv01767
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Susan R. Garriss , Tom Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Robinson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05104
Plaintiff:
Murice Robinson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Braulio Aponte, John Doe 1, 2 & 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Makowski v. United Brotherhood of Carpent
as 10-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Makowski
Defendant:
Ahern Painting Contractors, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 157 of District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Makowski v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al
as 1:2008cv06150
Plaintiff:
Robert Makowski
Defendant:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
