Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jessie E. Jones v. T. Wolak
as 12-2503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSIE E. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
TONIA M. WOLAK
Kyle Longacre v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 12-2110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE JOSEPH LONGACRE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, Governor, State of Michigan, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, UNKNOWN CURLEY, Warden and others
Longacre #626648 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kyle Joseph Longacre #626648
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Curley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gresham v. Tonia Wolak, et al
as 12-1661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TONIA M. WOLAK, Psychologist, DLLP and NANNETTE NORWOOD, Deputy Warden
Michael Gresham v. Tonia Wolak, et al
as 12-1565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TONIA M. WOLAK, Psychologist, DLLP and NANNETTE NORWOOD, Deputy Warden
Gresham #272603 v. Snyder et al
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Bill Schuette, Daniel Heynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts #360595 v. Eyke et al
as 2:2011cv00330
Plaintiff:
Serell Butts #360595
Defendant:
Paul Eyke, Senta Rose, Danielle S. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gresham v. James Lachance, et al
as 11-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LACHANCE, UNKNOWN BOMMENSHENKIAL, RUO, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, John Doe, RUO and others
Gresham #272603 v. LaChance et al
as 2:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Jim LaChance, Unknown Bommenshenkial, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gresham v. Tonia Wolak, et al
as 10-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TONIA M. WOLAK, Psychologist, DLLP, NANNETTE NORWOOD, Deputy Warden, KIRT R. DOZEMAN, Psychologist M.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
