Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Gibbs v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Gibbs
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Warden Tony Mays, Lieutenant Charles Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Mays et al
as 3:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Rogers
Defendant:
Warden Tony Mays, Linda Stokes, Sean Lenard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyale Blacksmith v. Tony Mays
as 23-5341
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOYALE M. BLACKSMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
TONY MAYS, Warden
Rogers v. Mays et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Rogers
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Linda Stokes, Michael Jemeyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denver McMath, Jr. v. Tony Mays
as 23-5194
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENVER JOE MCMATH, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden and TONY MAYS, Warden
Vaughn v. Mays
as 1:2023cv01036
Petitioner:
Harold Allen Vaughn
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jon Hall v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-5119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JON HALL
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, Tennessee's Commissioner of Correction, in his official capacity, WARDEN TONY MAYS, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, in his official capacity and UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL KEYS, Death Row, in his official capacity
Middlebrooks v. Helton et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Donald Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Tony Mays, Earnest Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RonAllen Hardy v. Tony Mays
as 22-6107
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALLEN HARDY
Respondent / Appellee:
TONY MAYS, Warden
Pruitt v. Mays
as 2:2022cv02855
Petitioner:
Corinio Pruitt
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
