Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al v. Torres
as 3:2012cv01573
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Mahattan National Association, Long Beach Mortgage Co and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, Richard Hamel, Jason Lanore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 3:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, Richard Hamel, Jason Lanore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clack v. Torre et al
as 3:2010cv01905
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Clack, III
Defendant:
Michael Torre, Mark O'Connor, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chacon et al v. East Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2010cv01692
Plaintiff:
Marcia Chacon , Wilfrido Matute , James Manship and others
Defendant:
East Haven Police Dept, Town of East Haven, Leonard Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
