Cases 1 - 10 of 69
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Village of Bethalto v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08182
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Bethalto
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Nokomis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
City of Pattonsburg v. Ashland et al
as 1:2010cv08743
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Pattonsburg
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Clean Water Act - Citizen Suits re Environmental Matters
Kennett, City Of et al v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08742
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kennett, City Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 tl Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Coraopolis Water And Sewer Authority v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07874
Plaintiff:
Coraopolis Water and Sewer Authority
Cross Defendant:
Ashland, Inc., Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Sunoco, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Coastal Oil New England, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Kouts Town of v. Ashland Inc et al
as 1:2010cv08184
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kouts Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant:
El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner:
Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne:
Barker Hamill
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
State of Rhode Island v. Alon Refining Krotz Springs et al
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Defendant:
Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
