Cases 1 - 6 of 6
WALSH v. PATEL et al
as 1:2022cv03336
Plaintiff:
JOHN J WALSH, JR. and JOHN J. WALSH, JR.
Defendant:
HARDIKKUMAR PATEL, ROBERT WINKEL, OFFICER LUPINETTI (BADGE 228) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Castro v. County of Atlantic, et al
as 21-1578
Defendant / Appellee:
MULLICA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, and its agents, servants, representatives and employees, DIANE RUBERTON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN MAHER, individually and in his capacity as a Chief Assistant Prosecutor for the Atlantic County Prosecutors Office, DAREN DOOLEY, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Detectives for the Atlantic County Prosecutors Office, BRUCE K. DESHIELDS, individually and in his capacity as a supervisor for the Atlantic County Prosecutors Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL CASTRO
Betty Bembry v. Township of Mullica, et al
as 17-3066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY A. BEMBRY
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, BERTHA CAPPUCCIO and KIMBERLY KIRKENDOLL, a/k/a Kimberly Johnson
BEMBRY v. TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA et al
as 1:2016cv05734
Plaintiff:
BETTY A. BEMBRY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA, BERTHA CAPPUCCIO and KIMBERLY KIRKENDOLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE ARROYO et al v. CITY OF EGG HARBOR et al
as 1:2010cv05831
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE ARROYO , ISABEL ARROYO , GILBERTO ARROYO, SR. and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EGG HARBOR , EGG HARBOR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , EGG HARBOR CITY POLICE CHIEF, JOHN MCCOLGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STANLEY v. TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA et al
as 1:2008cv06128
Plaintiff:
BILLY STANLEY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA, MULLICA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE, TOWNSHIP OF MULLICA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
