Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 14-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, JOHNNY BLEVINS, RANDY KNIGHT and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 13-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Berryhill v. Workman, et al
as 12-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, LINDA MORGAN, Deputy Warden, ART LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 12-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Barrett v. Workman, et al
as 12-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, DEBBIE MORTON, Deputy Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, CHAD BROWN, Case Worker, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and others
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Berryhill v. Workman, et al
as 11-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL WORKMAN, LINDA MORGAN, ART LIGHTLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
