Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCINTYRE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18224
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCINTYRE
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darnell Nolley v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 18-11668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigations and Compliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
NOLLEY v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CLARK
Defendant:
DENNIS BROWN, ERIC SELLERS, GEORGE IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Wiliams et al
as 4:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Scourterrious Lofton
Defendant:
Stanley Wiliams, Bynum, Tracy McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFFIN v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
DERON J RUFFIN
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, CYNTHIA NELSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOX v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M MADDOX
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, TREVONZA BOBBITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULLINAX v. OWENS et al
as 5:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M MULLINAX
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Owens et al
as 6:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Stanley Williams, Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
