Cases 61 - 70 of 100
ALI v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Petitioner:
ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Respondent:
COMMONPLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chambers v. Wingard et al
as 3:2015cv00653
Petitioner:
Maurice Chambers
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and Attorney General of the State of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. HYDE et al
as 3:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN HYDE, TREVOR WINGARD, HEIDI SROKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. THOMAS
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD, JOHN WETZEL and DANIEL MEUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00003
Petitioner:
KYLE SMITH
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. KANE et al
as 2:2014cv01741
Petitioner:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLOAN v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DANIEL GEHLMANN, OFFICER HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREIRA v. WINGARD et al
as 5:2014cv06582
Petitioner:
JONATHAN JOEL PEREIRA
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SARTIN v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SARTIN
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD, BEARJAR, ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sartin v. Wingard et al
as 3:2014cv02038
Plaintiff:
Willie Sartin
Defendant:
Trevor Wingard, Bearjar, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
