Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Warren v. CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Quennel D. Warren
Defendant:
CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, CorrectHealth, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentley v. Trinity Services Group Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Hall County Jail Medical Administration, Trinity Services Group Inc., 1st Lt. Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. Trinity Services Group Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Hall County Jail Medical Administration, Trinity Services Group Inc., 1st Lt. Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddleman v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00064
Defendant:
1st Lt. Ivey, Trinity Services Group, Inc., Captain Jeff Shoemaker and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Joe Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Trinity Services Group Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lennon Jay Mitchell
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group Inc., John Doe, Sergeant Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Mann et al
as 1:2018cv03338
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cortez Heard
Defendant:
DeKalb Co. Sheriff's Dept., Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Sheriff Jeffrey Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv05488
Plaintiff:
Jaiyeola Jack
Defendant:
Jeffery E. Mann, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Dekalb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv04970
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cortez Heard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02085
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc., Fulton County, Ted Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
