Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Webb, et al v. Tenn Mor Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kathryn WEBB
Defendant:
TENN MOR PROPERTIES, LLC, Adam Tripp, Tina K Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tripp v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Tripp
Defendant:
Amber E. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tripp v. Thomas
as 1:2018cv01230
Defendant:
Paul Thomas
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canales, Jr. et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv01148
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Canales, Jr. and Joshua Tripp
Defendant:
Paul Thomas, Gibson County Sheriff's Office and Gibson County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Millennium Home Furnisings and Accents, et al.
as 2:2016cv02786
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Millennium Home Furnisings and Accents
Defendant:
Karen Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stokes v. Tripp et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Brett D Stokes, Esq.
Defendant:
Irene Evans Tripp , Joseph A Tripp and James B Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Whitehorn, Tankersley, and Davis, PLLC et al v. Tripp
as 2:2012mc00044
Movant:
Whitehorn, Tankersley, and Davis, PLLC
Defendant:
Karen Tripp
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
