Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Liberty Truck Center, Inc. v. Cincinnati Casualty Company
as 3:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
Liberty Truck Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Cincinnati Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liberty Truck Center, Inc. v. Liberty Petroleum, LLC
as 3:2014cv02387
Plaintiff:
Liberty Truck Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Petroleum, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Liberty Petroleum, LLC v. Liberty Truck Center, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02320
Plaintiff:
Liberty Petroleum, LLC
Defendant:
Liberty Truck Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC. v. ML LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
ML LOGISTICS, LLC, MA HARRIS GROUP, LLC and MATILDA ANN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE HEIL CO. v. BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC.
as 2:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
THE HEIL CO.
Defendant:
BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ostopick v. McFarren et al
as 3:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ostopick
Defendant:
Keith McFarren , Whited Ford Truck Center , Whited Ford Truck Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. MACK TRUCKS, INC.
as 2:2004cv04007
Plaintiff:
RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. and RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
MACK TRUCKS, INC. , HEIL ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. and MCNEILUS TRUCK & MANUFACTURING, INC.
Counter_claimant:
MACK TRUCKS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC. and RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
