Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tubbs v. Strong et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Mail Room, Health Department, Recreational Department and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Tubbs
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Unknown Chambers, Dr., Health Department, Recreational Department and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Brown, Jimmy Powell, Jon Hill and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Annette Lavone Tubbs
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Tubbs v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Aundre R. Tubbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hopson v. Bryant et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Allery Deljuan Hopson
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Johnny Bell, Jimmy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. Bryant et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
Allery Deljuan Hopson
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Johnny Bell, Jimmy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs v. Warren County, MS et al
as 5:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tubbs
Defendant:
Warren County, MS, Martin Pace, Larry Vince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sales et al v. Bailey et al
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Sales , William E. White, Jr. and Wayne Tubbs, Jr.
Defendant:
James Bailey , Delta Products Tree Service, LLC and MS Right of Way Professionals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
