Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Payne et al v. Lugaro
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Sheehan Tucker Payne and Emily Jane Green
Defendant:
Stefan Lugaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TUCKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
ERIC DALE TUCKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tucker v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2023hc02284
Petitioner:
Bryant C Tucker
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
:MUHAMMAD v. SPIVEY et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
:BAARIA-ABDULLAH :MUHAMMAD and :BAARIA-ABDULLAH :MUHAMMAD doing business as :LUMIN-LUCKY: [OF THE FAMILY] LANDER
Defendant:
REX ALAN SPIVEY, STATE EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, PHILLIP A. GLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Tucker
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Tucker v. North Carolina St. DPS
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Jeffrey D. Tucker
Respondent:
North Carolina St. DPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eastern Wholesale Fence LLC v. Tucker et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Eastern Wholesale Fence LLC
Defendant:
Adam Tucker and Southern Fence and Gate, Inc., a North Carolina corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Crown Equipment Corporation v. Brady et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
David Brady, William Tucker, Joseph Boggs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
