Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Love v. Tact Team et al
as 3:2026cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rodney Love
Defendant:
Tact Team, IDOC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv08616
Plaintiff:
Casimir D Williams
Defendant:
Miller, Kucera, Jane Doe and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Orleans Parish Prison et al
as 2:2025cv00657
Plaintiff:
Laval Nolan Sullivan
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Prison and SID Tact Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nirin Walls v. N.P. Mershon, et al
as 24-3035
Defendant:
SONJA NICKLAUS, Warden, WEXFORD HEALTHCARE SERVICES, Through Contact With IDOC And Dixon Correctional Center, NURSE HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
NIRIN WALLS
Seats v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03876
Plaintiff:
Devin Seats
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and Menard Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Donnelle Thurman
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills and Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Jackson v. Joseph McCray, et al
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH MCCRAY, C/O, also known as MCCRAW, DALTON EUTSEY, C/O and JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Tact Team Supervisor
Thomas v. Jeffrey et al
as 3:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Adrian Thomas
Defendant:
Rob Jeffrey, Anthony Wills, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Placement Officer et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert E Morris
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Placement Officer, John/Jane Doe Sanitation Officer, Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. McCraw et al
as 3:2021cv50046
Defendant:
McCraw, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dixon Corr. Ctr. and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.