Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Henley v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO
as 1:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Tamara Henley
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Bundy
Defendant:
Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Bundy
Defendant:
Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fouche et al v. Grossklas et al
as 1:2023cv02232
Plaintiff:
Tamara Fouche and Adriana Underwood
Defendant:
#17311 William Grossklas, Superintendent David Brown and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stovall v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Achashverosh Ngola Mbandi, et al v. Pangea Ventures LLC, et al
as 22-3254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ACHASHVEROSH ADNAH AMMIYHUWD NGOLA MBANDI and VON MAXEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PANGEA VENTURES LLC, ZLJS LLC, WALTER CULBERTSON and others
Meyers v. Gatton et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Estate Plaintiff:
Tamara Meyers
Defendant:
Marcus E Gatton, Jason Spencer, Sean Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MBANDI et al v. PANGEA VENTURES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
ACHASHVEROSH ADNAH AMMIYHUWD NGOLA MBANDI and VON MAXEY
Defendant:
PANGEA VENTURES LLC, PANGEA REAL ESTATE, PETE MARTAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
