Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Pascua v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01738
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Bridget Pascua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Horton et al
as 2:2016cv01175
Defendant:
Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill, Sherrie Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stevens v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv00277
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Roberta Ann Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01029
Defendant:
S. Brooks, Cheryl Burson, T. Carlman and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Dr. Arera, R. Bannister, S. Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kapetan v. Cox
as 3:2013cv00171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Jennifer Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kapetan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Sandavol et al
as 2:2012cv02171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Duran Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vails v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv02064
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Dr. Bruce Bannister, Cheryl Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vails, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
