Cases 31 - 40 of 200
Tarango v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2019cv00590
Plaintiff:
Lenore Tarango
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel Mendoza-Tarango v. Simona Flores, et al
as 19-10588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MENDOZA-TARANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE FRANCIS CISSNA, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Director, SIMONA FLORES, Dallas Field Director and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Mendoza-Tarango v. Flores et al
as 4:2019cv00255
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielson, Lee Francis Cissna and Simona Flores
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Mendoza-Tarango
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rodrigo Tarango v. Chemix Energy Services, LLC
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant:
Chemix Energy Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tarango Jr. v. 4JLJ, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00078
Defendant:
John Jalufka, 4JLJ, LLC and 4JLJ, LLC doing business as J4 Oilfield Services
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tarango-Carizosa v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marco Tarango-Carizosa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447
Tarango v. USA
as 2:2017cv00067
Petitioner:
Yazmin Alejandra Tarango
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
