Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Wettstein and Sons, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01882
Defendant:
Samsung SDI Co Ltd, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Tatung Company of America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wettstein and Sons, Inc on behlaf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Wettstein's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Government of Puerto Rico et al v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al
as 4:2020cv05606
Defendant:
Hitachi Asia, LTD, Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN. BHD., Irico Group and others
Plaintiff:
Government of Puerto Rico
Government of Puerto Rico et al v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al
as 3:2019cv01246
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation of North America, SHENZHEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD, LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Government of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv03409
Defendant:
Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02368
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Compucom Systems Inc v. Hitachi Ltd et al
as 1:2017cv03283
Defendant:
Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc., Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, Edward Breivik and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv03285
Defendant:
Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
