Cases 1 - 10 of 25
May, Edith v. Hassan, Fatah et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Edith M May and Edith M. May
Defendant:
Fatah Hassan, (HSU) Health Services Unit, HSU Manager Radcliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. DeTeana et al
as 2:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Warden McDermott, Security Director Dogs, Dr Brewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Sgt John Doe et al
as 2:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Warden McDermott, Capt Magan, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2020cv01794
Defendant:
T-Moon, Ms Sublenski, H Paulsen and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. John/ Jane Doe Pharmacy et al
as 2:2020cv01688
Defendant:
Health Services Unit Manager, John/ Jane Doe Pharmacy, John/ Jane Doe Health Services Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2020cv01674
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer McDurmott, Lt Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01236
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klurfeld-Milshteyn v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution Health Service Unit
as 2:2018cv00325
Plaintiff:
Elenora K Klurfeld-Milshteyn
Defendant:
Taycheedah Correctional Institution Health Service Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deyot v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ann Deyot
Defendant:
Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
