Cases 1 - 6 of 6
National Association of Home Builders of the Unit, et al v. DC
as 26-7050
Plaintiff:
National Association of Home Builders of the United States, Restaurant Law Center, National Apartment Association and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America and American Gas Association
Natl Assn of Home Builders v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 26-1449
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES, RESTAURANT LAW CENTER, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, PHILADELPHIA-BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 96 and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (aliens and nationality)
National Association of Home Builders of the United States et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 8:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC., RESTAURANT LAW CENTER, MARYLAND BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6201 Energy Policy & Conservation Act (statement of purpose)
Washington Gas Light Company v. International Brotherhood
as 13-2102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local 96
Washington Gas Light Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 96
as 1:2013cv00560
Plaintiff:
Washington Gas Light Company
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 96
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
