Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TECK METALS, LTD v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2015mc01133
Petitioner:
TECK METALS, LTD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Anderson v. Teck Metals Ltd et al
as 2:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Barbara Anderson
Defendant:
Teck Metals Ltd and Teck Resources Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teck Metals Ltd v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd', et al
as 10-36130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TECK METALS LTD, AKA Teck Cominco Metals LTD
Defendant - Appellant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd, et al v. USDC-WAESP
as 10-73807
:
In re: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Petitioner:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
TECK METALS LTD, FKA Teck Cominco Metals LTD
Fielder v. Teck Metals Ltd. a/k/a Cominco Ltd.
as 4:2010cv01159
Plaintiff:
Mark Fielder
Defendant:
Teck Metals Ltd. a/k/a Cominco Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fielder v. Teck Metals Ltd. a/k/a Cominco Ltd.
as 2:2010cv01159
Plaintiff:
Mark Fielder
Defendant:
Teck Metals Ltd. a/k/a Cominco Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teck Metals Ltd v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd', et al
as 10-35131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TECK METALS LTD, AKA Teck Cominco Metals LTD
Defendant - Appellant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES
Teck Metals Ltd et al v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs
as 2:2009cv00290
Plaintiff:
Teck Metals Ltd, Teck Metals Ltd, History Associates Incorporated and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
