Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Schlenker v. USA
as 1:2014cv00017
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ted Ray Schlenker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker et al v. ProNational Insurance Company et al
as 7:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dennis Walker and Ted George
Defendant:
ProNational Insurance Company and ProAssurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Walker et al v. ProNational Insurance Company et al
as 7:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dennis Walker and Ted George
Defendant:
ProNational Insurance Company and ProAssurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koprowski v. Baker et al
as 6:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ted Koprowski
Defendant:
Karen Bennett Baker, Jorge Vazquez-Velazquez, Richard R. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flynn et al v. Shotcrete Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
John Flynn , James Boland , Gerald O'Malley and others
Defendant:
Shotcrete Services, Inc.
United States of America v. Estate of Ted W. Potts et al
as 5:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Ted W. Potts, Susan E. Binford, Mercantile Bank of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Roysdon et al
as 5:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ted D. Roysdon, Josiebelle Mays, The Unknown Spouse of Ted D. Roysdon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Bibb v. Ennenbach
as 3:2008cv00490
Plaintiff:
Adam Bibb
Defendant:
Ted Ennenbach
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stay-Dri Continence Management Systems, LLC et al v. Haire et al
as 4:2008cv00118
Plaintiff:
Stay-Dri Continence Management Systems, LLC, Ted Gomoll, Greg Bixby and others
Defendant:
Glen Martin Haire and Twin Rivers Textiles, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
