Cases 21 - 30 of 55
United States v. Nicholas Tensley
as 16-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nicholas DeCarlos Tensley
Tensley v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Petitioner:
Darian Renard Tensley
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons , U.S.P. Allenwood , Oddo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tensley v. Green et al
as 2:2014cv02203
Plaintiff:
Laaron Tensley
Defendant:
William Green , VTI Specialized, LLC and Northland Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roby et al v. Northland Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv02191
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Roby and Ronique S. Cornelius
Defendant:
Northland Insurance Company , VTI Specialized, LLC and William Green
Consol_plaintiff:
Laaron Tensley
Consol_defendant:
William Green , VTI Specialized, LLC and Northland Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tensley v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv03088
Petitioner:
Darian Renard Tensley
Respondent:
J. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cunningham v. Tensley et al
as 6:2013cv01202
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cunningham
Defendant:
Tensley and Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Tensley et al
as 5:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cunningham
Defendant:
Tensley and Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. David Tensley, Jr.
as 12-3216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David Jerome Tensley, Jr.
Tensley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ruby Lee Tensley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
