Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wright v. Slagle
as 1:2023cv00304
Petitioner:
Terrence Leroy Wright and Terrence Wright El
Respondent:
Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014ct03220
Plaintiff:
Samuel Junior Jackson, Napoleon J. Rankin Bey, James K. Hoyle Bey and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Graham County Clerk of Court et al
as 3:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright
Defendant:
Graham County Clerk of Court, State of North Carolina and U.S. District Court of North Carolina Western
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright El v. Holloway
as 2:2013de00007
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
Tammy Holloway
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright El v. Downs et al
as 2:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
James U. Downs, Graham County, Wanda Brooms and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright El v. Downs et al
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
James U. Downs, Graham County Clerk of Court, Graham County and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes, James Anderson-Bey, Eric Evans-El and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright-Bey v. State of North Carolina Dept. of Prison
as 2:2007cv00017
Petitioner:
Terrence Wright-Bey
Respondent:
State of North Carolina Dept. of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright-Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 2:2007cv00014
Petitioner:
Terrence Wright-Bey
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
