Cases 1 - 10 of 1,108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marte v. Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01616
Plaintiff:
Sylbaris Marte
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mirande v. Texas Roadhouse Management Corp.
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mirande
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Management Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. 1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
Claimant:
Feng Chen and Tianqiong Xu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
