Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bonner v. Batiste et al
as 4:2022cv03502
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bonner
Defendant:
Ayanal Batiste, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (TBPP)
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Paxton et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Jim Wallace, Secretary of the State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade, Jr. v. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 4:2017cv03260
Plaintiff:
Alex Melvin Wade, Jr.
Defendant:
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES , Tiffany Lynck and A. Oyewuwo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
Ivery T William
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01015
Defendant:
Sarah Caldwell-Frazier, Monica Keller, Andrew Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Carl V. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Respondent:
All Texas Law Enforcement Agencies, State of Texas, TDCJ-CID and others
Petitioner:
William E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoffman v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2012cv00149
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Baldey, Lisa Canizales, Sgt. FNU Castellano and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt vs Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2009cv01653
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wyatt
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Clark v. City Of Tyler et al
as 6:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert L Clark
Defendant:
City Of Tyler, Tyler Police Department, Frank Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
