Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Cantu v. Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center et al
as 7:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cantu
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center, Texas Juvenile Justice Department and Gabe Atsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Texas Youth Commission et al
as 4:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Giddings State School, Texas Youth Commission, Lee County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Eunice Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Landry v. Texas Youth Commission et al
as 1:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Larry Landry
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission and Roland G Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Texas Youth Commission
as 4:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mary Jacobs
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Texas Youth Commission
as 4:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Delmer Spencer
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ross et al v. State of Texas et al DO NOT DOCKET IN 08MC495. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2008mc00495
Plaintiff:
Haywood Mack Ross, Ronald Wayne Ross and Marshall Dwight Ross
Defendant:
State of Texas, Texas Youth Commission, Youth Services International Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
