Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge St. Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge St. Prison, C.O. Johnsin and C.O. Kennety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Mickduff and Mark Andersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Kennety et al
as 7:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Kennety, Johnson and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Macky and Portia Bennactt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Dental at RRJ and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Kennety et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Kennety, Johnson and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Staff of WRSP et al
as 7:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Staff of WRSP, Med Team, CO Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Staff of WRSP et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Staff of WRSP, Med Team, C.O. Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
