Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Becky Thatcher Designs, Inc. v. Huntington National Bank, The et al
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
BECKY THATCHER DESIGNS, INC.
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank, Dan Galbraith and Huntington National Bank, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thatcher v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2012cv10288
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
William J Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trustees for the Michigan Carpenters Council Pension Fund et al v. Thatcher Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2010cv01150
Plaintiff:
Trustees for the Michigan Carpenters Council Pension Fund , Trustees for the Michigan Carpenters Council Health and Welfare Fund , Trustees for the Michigan Carpenters Council Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Thatcher Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Stanton v. Hutchins et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Stanton
Defendant:
Nancy Hutchins, Bambi Somerlott, Laurie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thatcher #384349 et al v. Eaton, County of et al
as 2:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gary Alva Thatcher #384349, Mark Curtin #263758, Curtis Smith #292372 and others
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Macomb, County of, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Thatcher #384349 et al v. Greeley
as 2:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Gary Alva Thatcher #384349, Kelvin David Moffit #271355, David Clark #674357 and others
Defendant:
Timothy P. Greeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thatcher #384349 v. Woods
as 2:2009cv00114
Petitioner:
Gary Alva Thatcher #384349
Respondent:
Jeff Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
