Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Eichner et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023mc80220
Plaintiff: Jean-Marc Eichner, Brandon Loyd and United States of America
Defendant: OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, Ocwen Financial Corporation, U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee, on behalf of 457 Residential Mortgage Backed Securities Trust Defendants and others
Petitioner: Samuel L. Boyd and Boyd & Associates
Not Classified By Court: Fish & Richardson P.C.
Eichner et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2023mc80219
Plaintiff: Jean-Marc Eichner, Brandon Loyd and United States of America
Defendant: OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, Ocwen Financial Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. and others
Rusty Brown et al v. National Default Servicing Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01178
Plaintiff: Rusty Brown, as Trustee of the Charles R. Ellis Living Trust, Charles R. Ellis Living Trust, a Nevada Trust, Rusty Brown and others
Defendant: National Default Servicing Corporation, an Arizona corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon a/k/a The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation a/k/a BNY Mellon, Bank of America, N.A., a National Banking Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01650
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Song Pae v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08898
Plaintiff: SONG WON PAE, Sang Ok Pae, MEESON PAE YANG and others
Defendant: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon, Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Myong Suk Oh v. Reconstrust Company, N.A, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01808
Plaintiff: MYONG SUK OH
Defendant: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
RGN-Seattle XVII LLC v. A&D Partners LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01025
Defendant: A&D Partners, LLC, Umpqua Bank, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and others
Plaintiff: RGN-Seattle SVII, LLC and RGN-Seattle XVII LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Ladewig v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
as 2:2020cv04032
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and DOES 1 to 5
Plaintiff: David Ladewig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gosha et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00470
Plaintiff: Gary C. Gosha and Kit M. Gosha
Defendant: Clear Recon Corp, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Consul Group Re Dos Mil Veintiuno Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada et al v. Lidia Zinchenko et al
as 2:2019cv01254
Plaintiff: CONSUL GROUP RE DOS MIL VEINTIUNO SOCIEDAD DE RESPONSABILIDAD LIMITADA AKA CONSUL GROUP RE 2021 S.R.L. AKA CONSUL GROUP RE 2021, LTDA, a Costa Rican limited liability company, WISE NETWORK, S.A., a Costa Rican corporation, Consul Group Re Dos Mil Veintiuno Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada and others
Defendant: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION aka BNY MELLON, a Delaware corporation, R ADVISORY GROUP, LTD., an England and Wales Company, MICHAEL GUSS AKA MICHAEL GAUSS AKA MIKHAIL GASS AKA MICHAEL I GUSS AKA MICHAEL I. SYROEJINE AKA MIKHAIL IVAN SYROJINE AKA MICHAEL SYROJESCHIN, AKA MIKHAIL SYROETINE, an individual, and dba EMBLES FINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?