Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Teo v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 0:2019cv63042
Plaintiff:
Alfred S Teo, Sr. and Alfred S.K. Teo, Sr.
Defendant:
Esq. William P. Barr, Esq. Ashley Moody, Regina Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pozner v. United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives et al.
as 8:2018cv02505
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and Sonila Kulla Talo
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pozner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Garrette v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 8:2016cv02823
Plaintiff:
Denise Garrette
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marshall v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2011cv21247
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Marshall
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Marshall v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2010cv21424
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Marshall
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Miami Federal Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Faulkner v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 3:2008cv01115
Petitioner:
Dwayne Hoby Faulkner
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faulkner v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2008mc00042
Petitioner:
Dwayne Hoby Faulkner
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Faulkner v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2008cv01112
Petitioner:
Dwayne Hoby Faulkner
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
