Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Thompson, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2018cv00147
Defendant:
Kathy Adams-Blackeye, Allen Ambler, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa George, Boyd Graham, Jacqueline Hodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephanie Tabibian et al vs The Secretary of Department of the Interior, et al
as 3:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Danley Adkins and Stephanie Tabibian
Defendant:
The Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Blackwater et al vs Secretary of the Department of the Interior
as 3:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Rusty Coal Blackwater and Trent Lane Blackwater
202) 208-5320 (fax:
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Winnemucca Indian Colony et al v. United States of America Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2011cv00622
Intervenor Defendant:
Ms. Linda Ayer
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Superintendent of the Western Nevada Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Wasson and Winnemucca Indian Colony
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Dyer et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Fort McDermitt Paiute/Shoshone Tribe In their Official and Individual Capacity
as 3:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lorraine S. Dyer, Daniel Snapp and Delora Snapp
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Fort McDermitt Paiute/Shoshone Tribe In their Official and Individual Capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
