Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 592
Tohono O'odham Nation et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Tohono O'odham Nation, San Carlos Apache Tribe, Archaeology Southwest and others
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor: SunZia Transmission LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition et al v. Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv02038
Plaintiff: Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthworks and others
Defendant: Martha Guzman, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Los Padres Forestwatch, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-55801
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, KEEP SESPE WILD COMMITTEE, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF OJAI and COUNTY OF VENTURA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, KARINA MEDINA, District Ranger, United States Forest Service, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Northwest Environmental Defense Center et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 3:2023cv01335
Plaintiff: Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Angler and others
Defendant: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Deanne Criswell and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
Klamath Forest Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service
as 3:2023cv03601
Plaintiff: Klamath Forest Alliance, Earth Island Institute, Sequoia Forestkeeper and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service and Kerwin S Dewberry
Intervenor Defendant: South32 Hermosa Incorporated, Arizona Standard LLC and Arizona Minerals Incorporated
Amicus Curiae: Town of Patagonia
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 23-35299
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Waterkeeper Alliance, et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-636
Petitioner: WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CLEAN WATER ACTION and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor: AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS and AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Friends of the Inyo, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-15492
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIENDS OF THE INYO, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and LEEANN MURPHY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KORE MINING, LTD.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?