Cases 1 - 10 of 684
PENA et al v. CARDONA et al
as 5:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO PENA and NANCY PENA
Defendant:
CHIEF ROXANNE CARDONA, OFFICER J ORTIZ, CHAD COVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirksey v. Leseur et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Kirksey
Defendant:
Chief FNU Leseur and C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jimenez v. San Antonio Police Officer et al
as 5:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Chancey David Jimenez
Defendant:
San Antonio Police Officer, Balcones Heights Chief, Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
