Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Johnson v. Department of Labor (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Department of Labor (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Department of Labor (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Department of Labor
as 5:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Haley v. Walmart Supercenter et al
as 2:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
LaSonia Haley
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter, Sams Club, Broadmoore Gardens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) et al
as 5:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Housing for Urban Development (HUD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Department of Labor
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Eric Torres
Defendant:
Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 5:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Justice, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
