Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Santana v. Ransom et al
as 3:2023cv01428
Petitioner:
Eric O. Santana
Respondent:
Kevin J. Ransom, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANTANA v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2023cv03058
Petitioner:
ERIC O. SANTANA
Respondent:
KEVIN J. RANSOM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLANCO v. COMMONWEALTH et al
as 4:2022cv00373
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MORA POLANCO
Respondent:
Commonwealth, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLANCO v. COMMONWEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00619
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MORA POLANCO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMILTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
as 3:2020cv01476
Respondent:
The Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and Superintendent, Estock
Petitioner:
Shawn James Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMILTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
as 2:2020cv03260
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK
Petitioner:
SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROYSTER v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv02271
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROYSTER
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ____________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carson v. Mooney et al
as 3:2018cv01122
Petitioner:
George Carson
Respondent:
Vince Mooney, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General Of The State Of Pa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARSON v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv01603
Petitioner:
GEORGE CARSON
Respondent:
VINCE MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLLARD v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2017cv01165
Petitioner:
WESLEY M. POLLARD, SR.
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
