Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Doobay v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv12007
Petitioner:
Karamchand Doobay
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv10381
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Tennille v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv10171
Petitioner:
Lawrence Kemp Tennille
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cherry Health Community Treatment Center, Matthew Call and others
Jean v. Johns et al
as 1:2021cv00432
Defendant:
GEO Corporation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy Johns and others
Plaintiff:
Richekad Jean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
South v. Hemingway et al
as 2:2020cv12906
Defendant:
Jessica Seaton, Ms. Moore, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jason South
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00018
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kerr v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv11640
Defendant:
State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Amy Schneider, Tracy L. Goss and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kerr
Sapp v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv13691
Plaintiff:
Lamount M. Sapp
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Solano-Moreta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2016cv00208
Petitioner:
Jorge Solano-Moreta
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Robert Napel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lumbard #878389 v. St. Joseph County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
Nathan K. Lumbard #878389
Defendant:
St. Joseph County Sheriff Department, Michigan Department of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
