Cases 31 - 40 of 411
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deangelo Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and M Stegal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOFFMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MONTE G HOFFMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RULE and BARNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Monte G Hoffman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rule and Barnhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Rule et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr
Defendant:
Rule, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2022cv50199
Plaintiff:
Hanoi Barbaro Acosta
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fairly Earls v. BOP
as 22-2023
Petitioner / Appellant:
FAIRLY W. EARLS
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Clay v. Pingatore et al
as 3:2022cv50184
Plaintiff:
Gary Lebron Clay
Defendant:
K Pingatore, T Brewer, United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waugh v. USA et al
as 3:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Waugh
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kathy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Morgan v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv50080
Plaintiff:
Jack William Morgan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Warden Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
