Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Godinez-Duran v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019hc02302
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brick Tripp and GEO Group, Inc
Petitioner:
Erick Ricardo Godinez-Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
West v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018ct03230
Defendant:
Rivers Correctional Institution and The GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Emerson West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cobble v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018ct03050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, US Bureau of Prisons, US Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donaldson v. GEO Group, Inc et al
as 5:2016ct03319
Plaintiff:
Corey Allan Donaldson
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc, Tony Norman, Tracy Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Tripp et al
as 5:2016ct03192
Plaintiff:
Gary Emerson West
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, The GEO Group, Inc., Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Tripp et al
as 5:2016ct03087
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, Ms. Dunlow, Jeffrey Dr. Patane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cardona-Elias v. Tripp et al
as 5:2015ct03289
Plaintiff:
Juan Cardona-Elias
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, Nurse Perry, Nurse Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Banks v. Brinkema et al
as 5:2015ct03012
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Banks
Defendant:
Lenie M. Brinkema, Paul J. McNulty, Patrick Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daughtry v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2014ct03303
Plaintiff:
Theodore Daughtry
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Brick Tripp, David Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdeljalil v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2014ct03280
Plaintiff:
Muawia Abdeljalil
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Chaplain Williams, Brick Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
