Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Pool Specialists, Inc. v. Ryobi, Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pool Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryobi, Ltd, Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Holdings (USA), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bailey v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Bailey
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roy v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 7:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Charles Roy
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Behr Process Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joan Edwards
Defendant:
Behr Process Corporation, Behr Paint Corporation, Masco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Note et al v. Wing Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 5:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Carl O. Van Note and Marlen R. Van Note
Defendant:
Wing Enterprises, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Van Note et al v. Wing Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 4:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Carl O. Van Note and Marlen R. Van Note
Defendant:
Wing Enterprises, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BRADLEY v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00171
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANIKA BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
