Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Dakota Nelson v. Vera McCormick
as 20-1861
Defendant:
MAC WARNER, in his official capacity as West Virginia Secretary of State
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC HOUSE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE, BELINDA BIAFORE, individually and as Chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party, ELAINE A. HARRIS, individually and as Chairperson of the Kanawha County Democratic Executive Committee and others
Amicus Curiae:
HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT, STATE OF GEORGIA and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant / Appellant:
VERA MCCORMICK, in her official capacity as Clerk of Kanawha County, West Virginia and all county ballot commissioners for the state of West Virginia
Dakota Nelson v. Mac Warner
as 20-1860
Defendant:
VERA MCCORMICK, in her official capacity as Clerk of Kanawha County, West Virginia and all county ballot commissioners for the state of West Virginia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC HOUSE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE, BELINDA BIAFORE, individually and as Chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party, ELAINE A. HARRIS, individually and as Chairperson of the Kanawha County Democratic Executive Committee and others
Amicus Curiae:
HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT, STATE OF GEORGIA and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant / Appellant:
MAC WARNER, in his official capacity as West Virginia Secretary of State
League of Women Voters of Virginia et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 6:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Christopher E. Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, John O'Bannon and others
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of Virginia, Seijra Toogood, Katherine D. Crowley and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Honest Elections Project, Landmark Legal Foundation and PILF
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican Party of Virginia, Inc.
Petitioner:
Sandy Burchett, Diane Crickenberger, Thomas N. Turner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
