Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carattini v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jacob Carattini
Defendant:
Blumenthal, Chief Public Defender, Connecticut Supreme Court Justices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Chief Public Defender, State Sennate Members and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Roy Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Blumenthal, Chief Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Blumenthal, Chief Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
Tajah S. McClain
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Blumenthal, Chief Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Connecticut Legislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2019cv01879
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Blumenthal, Connecticut Legislative Law Revision Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. New Haven et al
as 3:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Department of Human Rights and Human Services, House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Human Rights and Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards and Derrick Edward
Defendant:
Department of Human Rights and Human Services, Fikrig, Yale Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
