Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kamentsa Inga Church-Soul of the Hummingbird, Inc. et al v. Garland, Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2023cv04173
Plaintiff:
Kamentsa Inga Church-Soul of the Hummingbird, Inc., Hector-Aliro Ortiz Jimenez, Individually and as Spiritual Leader of the Church, Taraina Phillips, Member of the Church and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Anne Milgram, Administrator of the U.S. DEA and Christopher Magnus, Commissioner of the U.S. CBP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Constable Sherman Eagleton, Precinct 3, Harris County, Texas Individually and In His Official Capacity et al
as 4:2023cv03699
Plaintiff:
Frank Alton Miller
Defendant:
Constable Sherman Eagleton, Precinct 3, Harris County, Texas Individually and In His Official Capacity and Other Unknown Members of Precinct 3, Harris County, Texas, Individually and In Their Official Capacity
Intervenor Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza et al v. La Salle County, Texas et al
as 5:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kayla Garza, Kiana Garza, Kyrssa Garza and others
Defendant:
La Salle County, Texas and Miguel Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Janjua-Vessel, et al. v. Bray, et al.
as 4:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Adnan Umair Janjua-Vessel and Uzma Janjua-Vessel
Defendant:
Jay Bray and /or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as CEO of NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud, doing business as Mr. Cooper, Christopher Marshall and /or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as CFO of NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud, doing business as Mr. Cooper, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC an ens legis being used to conceal fraud, Its Successors and/Or Assigns doing business as Mr. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thompson v. McGehee et al
as 3:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thompson
Defendant:
Individual/Official Acy McGehee, The City of Godley, Texas, Individual/Official Matthew Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marisol Almanza, Individually and as Next Friend of Jesus Cruz-Almanza et al v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Marisol Almanza, Individually and as Next Friend of Jesus Cruz-Almanza, Armando Cruz, Victoria Cruz and others
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas, Chief of Police J. Toler, Officer T.A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward et al v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Rowena Ward individually, and On behalf of the Estate of Rory Ward Jr., Rory Ward Sr. and Rowena Ward
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons, Jr., et al v. Broderick et al
as 1:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SIMMONS, JR., Individually and as Parent of his child WILLIE SIMMONS, III., DECEASED, VANESSA PENSON, Individually and as Parent of her child WILLIE SIMMONS, III., DECEASED, CHARLENE DENISE RAMIREZ, Individually and as Parent of AMANDA DENISE BRODERICK, DECEASED, and as an HEIR of ALYSSA MARIE RAMIREZ, DECEASED, and on behalf of CAYDEN NICHOLAS BRODERICK now CAYDEN PAUL RAMIREZ, a minor and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN BRODERICK, TRAVIS COUNTY, TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brian Jenkins v. Lamar County, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JENKINS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brian Jenkins
Defendant:
Lamar County, Texas, FORREST BIGLER and JEFFERY RANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
