Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MRK2 Brokerage LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
MRK2 BROKERAGE, LLC and MRK2 Brokerage LLC
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR REGISTERED HOLDERS OF LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LONG TRUST 2005-WL2, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-WL2 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Pride Energy Company v. The Long Trusts
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
The Long Trusts
Plaintiff:
Pride Energy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 6:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
John T Crim, Allan Long, Maggie Hudson and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, John Doe and Union Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Long Trust v. State Farm Lloyds
as 6:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
The Long Trust
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Long Trust v. State Farm Lloyds
as 6:2009cv00311
Plaintiff:
The Long Trust and The Long Trust
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
The Long Trust v. State Farm Lloyds
as 6:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
The Long Trust
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Gallagher, et al v. Richard Long, et al
as 08-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G. GALLAGHER, AKA Bobby Freeman and BETTY FRANKLIN
Plaintiff:
JOHN FALCONI
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD S. LONG, CYNTHIA A. LONG, TRUSTEES FOR THE RICHARD S. AND CYNTHIA A. LONG TRUST and others
Gallagher et al v. Long et al
as 3:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Gallagher, Betty Franklin, Carl W. Martin and others
Defendant:
Richard S. Long, Cynthia A. Long, Richard S. Long as Trustee for the Richard S. and Cynthia A. Long Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
