Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NAVALSKY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2024cv01238
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NAVALSKY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
SPENCER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 1:2023cv23307
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH H. SPENCER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. A/K/A AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCS., PC v. AETNA LIFE INS. CO. et al
as 2:2020cv15622
Defendant:
COMMVAULT SYS., INC., AETNA HEALTH INC., 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCS., PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walters v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2016cv10624
Plaintiff:
Larry S Walters
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CISCO v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 3:2014cv02803
Plaintiff:
E. BERNARD CISCO
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
HOLMAN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.,
as 2:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
VONCILLE HOLMAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
PHILPOT v. AMTRAK RAILROAD NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv07265
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PHILPOT
Defendant:
AMTRAK RAILROAD NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. and TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Philip Fischer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv00926
Defendant:
DOES, DOES, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Fischer
Cyril Hunte et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corp
as 5:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cyril Hunte, Cyril Hunte, Arlene Hood and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp and National Railroad Passenger Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
