Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 41 - 50 of 484
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
County of Monterey et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06470
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF MONTEREY, a political subdivision of the State of California;, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF MONTEREY, County of Monterey and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06448
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation et al v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT et al
as 1:2022cv06467
Plaintiff: CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, a political subdivision of the State of California and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
Defendant: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT and McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
San Benito County et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06302
Plaintiff: San Benito County, City Of San Jose, The People of the State of California, acting by and through the County of San Benito and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brooks We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv06334
Petitioner: Marcel Brooks
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Covello et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05777
Petitioner: Benjamin Ramirez Ruiz
Respondent: Warden Patrick Covello and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scarlett v. Rosen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05436
Plaintiff: Sidney Theodore Scarlett
Defendant: Jeffery Francis Rosen, Daniel T. Nishigaya, Patrick Michael Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05214
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achane v. People of the State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05100
Petitioner: Dallas Brooks Achane
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. People of the State of California
as 3:2022cv04747
Petitioner: Peter Torres Ramirez
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?