Intellectual Property Cases
Dannez Hunter v. PepsiCo, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1424
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANNEZ W. HUNTER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: PEPSICO, INC., a corporation, QUAKER OATS COMPANY, a corporation, PINNACLE FOODS GROUP, LLC, a corporation and others
Hunter et al v. PepsiCo Inc. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv06011
Plaintiff: D W Hunter and Larnell Evans, Jr.
Defendant: PepsiCo Inc. , Quaker Oats Company, The , Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Scentsational Technologies, LLC v. Pepsico, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08645
Defendant: Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., The Quaker Oats Company and others
Plaintiff: Scentsational Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 pt Patent Infringement
Scentsational Technologies, LLC v. Pepsico, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2013cv08645
Plaintiff: Scentsational Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Pepsico, Inc., Pepsi-Cola Technical Operations, Inc., The Quaker Oats Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Patent Research Institute, L.L.C. v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 2:2011cv00167
Plaintiff: Patent Research Institute, L.L.C.
Defendant: The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Quaker Oats Company v. Nadajafinia, et al
as 2:2007cv01409
Plaintiff: Quaker Oats Company, Quaker Oats Company and Quaker Oats Company
Defendant: Heidi Nadajafinia and John Doe Nadajafinia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lemelson Medical Ed v. Alcon Laboratories, et al
as 2:2000cv00661
Defendant: Pillsbury Company, New Dana Perfumes Company, Quaker Oats Company and others
Plaintiff: Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?